Washington federal judge keeps Crane, Carrier in meso suit

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos: A federal judge in Seattle has partly denied and partly granted motions by Crane Co. and Carrier Corp. for summary judgment in a lawsuit in which a former Navy sailor alleges he developed mesothelioma from exposure to the defendants’ asbestos-containing products.

Plaintiff Richard Nelson, who served on the USS Kitty Hawk from 1961 to 1964, raised sufficient evidence that he was exposed to the two companies’ products to send the questions to a jury, U.S. District Judge James L. Robart of the Western District of Washington said in a Dec. 9 order.

(WestlawNext users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.)

(more…)

Divided 4th Circuit tells judge to rethink jurisdiction issue in meso suit

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos: A split 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, has told a federal judge in Maryland to reconsider his decision to send an asbestos-related personal injury lawsuit against Colgate-Palmolive Co. back to state court.

The lone dissenter said the majority was ordering the judge to “in effect, redo his ‘mid-term exam’ on removal jurisprudence.”

(WestlawNext users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.) (more…)

N.Y.C. property owner asks Supreme Court to revive suit over 9/11 contamination

By Ken Bradley, Senior Legal Writer, Westlaw Journals

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos: The U.S. Supreme Court should review a 2nd Circuit decision that found the owners and lessees of the World Trade Center were immune from an environmental cleanup lawsuit stemming from the Sept. 11 attacks, according to a developer that spent $26 million to remove asbestos and other “WTC dust” from its nearby property.

In a reply brief filed with the high court Nov. 7, Cedar & Washington Associates, which owns a property at 130 Cedar St. in New York, says the appeals court’s decision “threatens to have wide-ranging and profound impacts on issues of national significance ranging from the balance of war power between the executive branch and Congress, to the stability of the insurance and commercial real estate markets.”

(WestlawNext users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.) (more…)

Plaintiffs’ firm blasts unsealing of records in Garlock bankruptcy dispute

By Ken Bradley, Senior Legal Writer, Westlaw Journals

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos: An effort to unseal records related to Garlock Sealing Technologies’ bankruptcy proceeding is “nothing more than a frivolous attempt to discourage victims of asbestos products and their representatives from seeking just compensation,” an attorney for a plaintiffs’ law firm said in a Nov. 3 statement.

Garlock has no one but itself to blame for the bankruptcy, Michael W. Magner of Jones Walker LLP said.  Magner represents Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, one of the law firms ordered, in related litigation, to release records from lawsuits for asbestos-exposure injuries it filed against Garlock and other companies.

(WestlawNext users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.)

(more…)

Auto insurer’s exclusion violates public policy, California appeals court says

From Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage: A passenger injured in a car crash can seek to recover from his roommate-driver’s insurance company despite a non-relative resident exclusion in the policy, a California appeals court has ruled.

In what the injured party’s attorney said was a case of first-impression in the state, the 4th District Court of Appeal said in a published opinion that the exclusion was overbroad and must be stricken as invalid.

(WestlawNext users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.) (more…)

Insurers responsible for up to $1.8 billion in asbestos claims, N.J. appellate court says

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos: About 50 primary and excess insurance companies are on the hook for hundreds of millions in asbestos liabilities, a New Jersey appeals court has ruled, affirming a lower court’s decision.

The insurers brought the appeal of a trial court verdict in 2010 that found they were obligated to pay for coverage for IMO Industries Inc. in underlying asbestos-related injury suits up to the policies’ limits of $1.85 billion, attorneys involved with the case said.

(WestlawNext users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.) (more…)

Tire worker’s family wins $18.6 million verdict in Texas asbestos trial

By Ken Bradley, Senior Legal Writer, Westlaw Journal

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos:  The family of a Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. worker who developed mesothelioma after his alleged exposure to asbestos fibers at a Texas plant has won a $18.6 million verdict against the company in state court.

A jury in the Dallas County Court at Law on Sept. 5 awarded $2.7 million in noneconomic damages, $900,000 in economic damages and $15 million in punitive damages to the survivors of Carl Rogers, according to a statement released by their attorneys.

(Westlaw users: Click here for the ten most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.)

(more…)

Divided Texas high court finds asbestos medical report law constitutional

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos: A Texas law that requires the dismissal of asbestos personal injury suits in the absence of a physician’s report certifying a plaintiff’s pulmonary impairment is constitutional, a sharply divided Texas Supreme Court has ruled.

In its 5-4 ruling, the state high court said a trial court should have dismissed a lawsuit against Union Carbide Corp. because the family of a man who worked as an insulator for the company did not submit a report on his cause of death that was based on pulmonary testing results.

(WestlawNext users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.) (more…)

Boston federal jury returns $9 million verdict in meso case

From Westlaw Journal Asbestos: A Boston federal court jury has found that asbestos-spray insulation maker T&N Ltd. engaged in grossly negligent conduct in exposing a construction supervisor to the product and returned a $9.3 million verdict against the company.

The award returned June 20 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts included $6.2 million in punitive damages.

(Westlaw users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.) (more…)

Split high court gives some companies religious exemption on contraceptives

From Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage: Closely held, for-profit corporations may claim a religious exemption from the Affordable Care Act mandate requiring that most employers include copay-free contraception in employees’ health insurance plans, a sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

Relying on a 1993 statute that the court said provided “very broad protection for religious liberty,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the 5-4 majority that the law does not discriminate “against men and women who wish to run their businesses as for-profit corporations in the manner required by their religious beliefs.”

(Westlaw users: Click here for the 10 most recent stories from Westlaw Journals.)

(more…)